The One Metric That Separates Profitable SaaS Teams from Feature Factories
- gandhinath0
- Apr 23
- 4 min read
Product features are investments, and like any investment, they need a clear return. The "Percentage of Features with Clear Monetization Path" reveals exactly that - which parts of your product contribute to the bottom line.
This metric tracks features in three categories:
Make money directly through premium pricing, add-ons, or usage fees
Keep existing customers by offering upgrades (upsells) or expanded services
Features with no current or planned revenue connection
Features that don't make money - or help you make money later - are just technical debt with a nicer interface.
The Product Metric That Predicts Profitability
Definition:
The "Percentage of Features with Clear Monetization Path" measures how much of your SaaS product drives revenue. This metric examines each feature through a monetization lens:
Value Drivers:
Features that directly contribute to revenue through pricing, usage, or access controls
Engagement Drivers:
Features that indirectly generate revenue by improving retention and enabling future monetizationFormula:
Monetization Coverage =(Features with Defined Revenue Strategy ÷
Total Active Features) X 100Example Calculation
Consider a EdTech startup solution suite with 32 features:
Feature Type | Count | Examples |
Direct Monetization | 18 | AI lead scoring, advanced reporting |
Indirect Monetization | 8 | Basic contact management, email templates |
Non-Monetized | 6 | Legacy import tools, deprecated APIs |
Then, Monetization Coverage= [ (18+8) ÷ 32 ] × 100 = 81.25%
Why It Matters
This metric transforms feature decisions from subjective choices to business investments.
When features lack clear monetization paths, three critical issues emerge:
Engineering resources are consumed maintaining features that can't drive revenue growth
Pricing tiers become diluted with ineffective differentiators
Operational costs increase without corresponding gains in customer lifetime value
Common Pitfalls That Kill This Metric
Many teams get this metric wrong - not from lack of effort, but from loose definitions. Here are six mistakes that skew the results:
Counting future plans: A feature must make money now - what might happen later doesn't count
Guessing at value: Just because a feature keeps users around doesn't mean it makes money
Keeping old features: Unused and outdated features should not be in your total count
Team guidelines differ: When product, finance, and sales teams each count differently, the numbers mean nothing
Missing the details: Looking at pricing plans instead of checking each feature
Ignoring real use: A locked feature needs users to count - a paywall no one crosses is worthless
Is Your Product Paying for Itself Yet?
Source: 2024 SaaS Benchmarks & Strategic Analysis Reports
Most SaaS teams build more than they monetize.This table shows how efficient teams turn features into revenue - at every stage. Use it to spot where you’re falling behind, and what strategic lever to pull next:
Growth Stage | Monetization Coverage | Strategic Priorities |
Validation Seekers ($1M-$2M ARR) | 60–70% |
|
Traction Builders ($2M-$4M ARR) | 70–80% |
|
Scale Preparers ($4M-$7M ARR) | 80–90% |
|
Growth Accelerators ($7M-$10M ARR) | 90%+ |
|
Golden Rule: Match features to customer value, not build effort.
Why Your Monetization Coverage Is Low - and How to Fix It
Most SaaS teams build well but price poorly. Before making big changes, check these issues - especially if your coverage drops below 75%:
Good Features in Basic Plans:
Problem: Giving away value for free
Fix: Check pricing tiers quarterly using tools like Orb or Stax or your internal pricing matrix
Dead Features:
Problem: Old or custom builds sit unused but stay live
Fix: Remove features with less than 5% use unless they're needed for retention-critical workflow
Hidden Support Tools:
Problem: Tools stay stuck in support teams
Fix: Turn support tools into paid features that can be elevated as premium experiences, like HubSpot, Twilio and Zendesk did. Internal infrastructure isn’t just ops - it’s a Marketing Product Engineering opportunity
AI features bundled into base plans:
Problem: LLMs and compute-heavy features erode margins when not priced separately.
Fix: Use credit-based models or usage-based thresholds like Notion's $10/1,000 AI credits
Wrong Pricing Focus:
Problem: Charging by seats when users care about use or results
Fix: Re-map pricing to what matters (API calls, saved hours, workflows completed)
Costly Features:
Problem: Expensive features that cost more than they make
Fix: Track costs with tools like m3ter, cut what loses money
Quick Fix Frameworks
HOPE Framework
Score your existing features on three points: usage, value, and money-making potential. If a feature isn't driving retention or revenue, it needs a second look.
SWB Test (Solution Worth Building)
Apply this before build: If the feature won't boost ARR, user engagement, or retention - it doesn't deserve build time.
Key Takeaways:
SaaS teams with 80%+ monetized features show faster growth, easier fundraising, and lower churn
Each feature must either make money or keep paying customers
Intentionally design features with monetization built into their structure
Every feature needs to demonstrate measurable business value
Comments