top of page

The One Metric That Separates Profitable SaaS Teams from Feature Factories

  • gandhinath0
  • Apr 23
  • 4 min read

Product features are investments, and like any investment, they need a clear return. The "Percentage of Features with Clear Monetization Path" reveals exactly that - which parts of your product contribute to the bottom line.

This metric tracks features in three categories:

  • Make money directly through premium pricing, add-ons, or usage fees

  • Keep existing customers by offering upgrades (upsells) or expanded services

  • Features with no current or planned revenue connection

Features that don't make money - or help you make money later - are just technical debt with a nicer interface.

The Product Metric That Predicts Profitability

Definition:

The "Percentage of Features with Clear Monetization Path" measures how much of your SaaS product drives revenue. This metric examines each feature through a monetization lens:
Value Drivers:
Features that directly contribute to revenue through pricing, usage, or access controls
Engagement Drivers:
Features that indirectly generate revenue by improving retention and enabling future monetization

Formula:

Monetization Coverage =(Features with Defined Revenue Strategy ÷
                          Total Active Features) X 100

Example Calculation

Consider a EdTech startup solution suite with 32 features:

Feature Type

Count

Examples

Direct Monetization

18

AI lead scoring, advanced reporting

Indirect Monetization

8

Basic contact management, email templates

Non-Monetized

6

Legacy import tools, deprecated APIs

Then, Monetization Coverage= [ (18+8) ÷ 32 ] × 100 = 81.25%


Why It Matters

This metric transforms feature decisions from subjective choices to business investments.


When features lack clear monetization paths, three critical issues emerge:

  • Engineering resources are consumed maintaining features that can't drive revenue growth

  • Pricing tiers become diluted with ineffective differentiators

  • Operational costs increase without corresponding gains in customer lifetime value


Common Pitfalls That Kill This Metric

Many teams get this metric wrong - not from lack of effort, but from loose definitions. Here are six mistakes that skew the results:

Counting future plans: A feature must make money now - what might happen later doesn't count

Guessing at value: Just because a feature keeps users around doesn't mean it makes money

Keeping old features: Unused and outdated features should not be in your total count

Team guidelines differ: When product, finance, and sales teams each count differently, the numbers mean nothing

Missing the details: Looking at pricing plans instead of checking each feature

Ignoring real use: A locked feature needs users to count - a paywall no one crosses is worthless


Is Your Product Paying for Itself Yet?

Source: 2024 SaaS Benchmarks & Strategic Analysis Reports


Most SaaS teams build more than they monetize.This table shows how efficient teams turn features into revenue - at every stage. Use it to spot where you’re falling behind, and what strategic lever to pull next:

Growth

 Stage

Monetization Coverage

Strategic Priorities

Validation Seekers ($1M-$2M ARR)

60–70%

  • Monetize 3-5 core features that drive usage

  • Use freemium for key workflow features

Traction Builders ($2M-$4M ARR)

70–80%

  • Create 2-3 tiers with clear feature splits

  • Add caps on users, storage, collaboration

Scale Preparers ($4M-$7M ARR)

80–90%

  • Add usage-based pricing

  • Sell API access and AI credits

Growth Accelerators ($7M-$10M ARR)

90%+

  • Monetize AI and bundled features

  • Launch partner marketplace and revenue-share deals

Golden Rule: Match features to customer value, not build effort.


Why Your Monetization Coverage Is Low - and How to Fix It

Most SaaS teams build well but price poorly. Before making big changes, check these issues - especially if your coverage drops below 75%:

Good Features in Basic Plans:

Problem: Giving away value for free

Fix: Check pricing tiers quarterly using tools like Orb or Stax or your internal pricing matrix


Dead Features:

Problem: Old or custom builds sit unused but stay live

Fix: Remove features with less than 5% use unless they're needed for retention-critical workflow


Hidden Support Tools:

Problem: Tools stay stuck in support teams

Fix: Turn support tools into paid features that can be elevated as premium experiences, like HubSpot, Twilio and Zendesk did. Internal infrastructure isn’t just ops - it’s a Marketing Product Engineering opportunity

AI features bundled into base plans:

Problem: LLMs and compute-heavy features erode margins when not priced separately.

Fix: Use credit-based models or usage-based thresholds like Notion's $10/1,000 AI credits


Wrong Pricing Focus:

Problem: Charging by seats when users care about use or results

Fix: Re-map pricing to what matters (API calls, saved hours, workflows completed)


Costly Features:

Problem: Expensive features that cost more than they make

Fix: Track costs with tools like m3ter, cut what loses money


Quick Fix Frameworks

HOPE Framework

Score your existing features on three points: usage, value, and money-making potential. If a feature isn't driving retention or revenue, it needs a second look.


SWB Test (Solution Worth Building)

Apply this before build: If the feature won't boost ARR, user engagement, or retention - it doesn't deserve build time.


Key Takeaways: 

  • SaaS teams with 80%+ monetized features show faster growth, easier fundraising, and lower churn

  • Each feature must either make money or keep paying customers

  • Intentionally design features with monetization built into their structure

  • Every feature needs to demonstrate measurable business value


Curious about your Metric(s)?




Need to brainstorm?










Comments


bottom of page